| Victims of sexual harassment by geographic area, by place of occurrence of the most recent experience | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 2018 to August 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Geographical area & Type of situation | Population age 18 and over victim of at least one situation of sexual harassment 2* | | Place of occurrence of the most recent experience | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | In your neighbourhood | | | In your city but not your community | | | In your district | | | In another district | | | In another country | |
| | | Absolute | Percentage | | Absolute | Percentage | | Absolute | Percentage | | Absolute | Percentage | | Absolute | Percentage |
| SAINT LUCIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| All situations of sexual harassement 1* | 13 905 | | 4 713 | 34.2 | | 5 014 | 36.4 | | 2 052 | 14.9 | | 1 647 | 12.0 | | 274 | 2.0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NORTH (CASTRIES, GROS ISLET) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| All situations of sexual harassement 1* | 8 963 | | 2 217 | 24.7 | | 4 508 | 50.3 | | 1 172 | 13.1 | | 926 | 10.3 | | 140 | 1.6 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| SOUTH (REMAINING DISTRICTS) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| All situations of sexual harassement 1* | 4 942 | | 2 496 | 51.9 | | 506 | 10.5 | | 880 | 18.3 | | 720 | 15.0 | | 134 | 2.8 |
| 1* Includes: Unwanted gestures like whistling, hissing, etc., Unwanted comments about your physical appearance or body of a sexual nature, Somebody followed you against your will and made you feel uncomfortable with sexual intentions, Unwanted gestures like touching, hugging, kissing, etc., Unwanted sexual proposals or pressure for dates, Receiving unwanted gifts of sexual nature (for example underwear), Unwanted messages, e-mails or calls of sexual nature that offended you, Embarrassing and sexually explicit messages, photos or videos of you on the internet, Somebody indecently exposing themselves to you. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2* Excludes population that responded "Does not know/ Does not answer" | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Note 1: The estimates that appear in this tabulation are shadowed according to their level of precision in High, Moderate and Low, taking the Coefficient of Variation CV (%) as a reference. If the values are closer to 0 it indicates the estimate is more precise and vice versa. Moderate and Low precision requires a cautious use of the estimates in which the causes of high variability are analyzed and other indicators of precision and reliability are considered, such as the confidence interval. See table below for level of precision of the estimates: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| High: Indicates a CV (%) on a range of (0, 25) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Moderate: Indicates a CV (%) on a range of (25, 50) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Low: Indicates a CV (%) on a range of (50+) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Source: SLNCVS. Saint Lucia National Crime Victimization Survey, 2020. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
